“Maestro”

I was already irritated by director, star, and co-writer Bradley Cooper‘s Leonard Bernstein biopic “Maestro” less than two minutes in, when it became clear that this was a project created with the intention of appeasing awards voters instead of giving a comprehensive look at one of the most talented, successful, and important musicians in American history. This pretentious, clichéd, overly dramatic, and flimsy biopic is a textbook case of a filmmaker who is more in love with himself than his subject, and Cooper comes across as a wannabe “visionary” who is far too full of himself. He does a sad disservice to Bernstein, choosing to focus on the most boring, bland parts of his life rather than creating a fitting tribute to the legendary icon.

The film focuses on the love story between composer and conductor Leonard Bernstein and actress Felicia Montealegre (Carey Mulligan), starting with their first meeting, the starry-eyed period filled with irritating flirtatious banter, marriage, and the more tumultuous years that follow. It’s a chronicle of their relationship with a narrative that deteriorates into a lot of martial discord and eventually an overly dramatic display of theatrics as Felicia deals with a terminal illness.

This isn’t the type of film that’s a pleasure to watch, and it’s made even worse by Cooper’s exhausting, showy stylistic choices. The film features lots of Bernstein’s music but very little background about it, which will disappoint those looking for a more meaningful biopic. If you’re excited to watch a lot of arguing between a couple that’s filmed in the most contrived and gimmicky fashion, this will prove thrilling.

The lead performances are strong, and Cooper’s charismatic charm shines through. He’s a bit of a ham as Bernstein, and it feels too over the top even before the film’s second act. Mulligan gives a reliably solid (if showy) turn, but the performances get lost in the shuffle of this chore and bore of a film.

With “Maestro,” Cooper seems to have shifted his focus to winning an Oscar and subsequently forgotten to tell the audience anything meaningful about Leonard Bernstein or his legacy, which is a shame. This is a movie helmed by a director who thinks he’s making his masterpiece, but nobody appears willing to tell him that indeed he is not.

By: Louisa Moore

10 comments

  1. This film needed serious script revision and a different director. Cooper was truly excellent as the older Bernstein and it is a shame that the story was so haphazard.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. while cinematically adventurous, the film was an insult to Bernstein…it is corrupted by the obsession with identity politics, and one leaves not knowing that LB was arguably the greatest conductor in U.S. history, the person who brought Mahler back into public consciousness) (Mahler’s name is not mentioned, probably the premier music educator in history, a composer of monumental music across a wide variety of genres, a major intellectual (there is not one conversation in the film that suggests we are in the presence of a genius) etc. Who cares if he was bisexual.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m some way through. 5 mins into the colour section, and so far agree. The black and white section is shot to be fly on the wall almost, like a home movie, which could be charming but I find the couple’s interactions to be pretentious, self conscious and stilted. It’s all so frenetic. There’s no time for chemistry, yet we’re to believe in this great love. I’m so uninvested, but I’ll watch the rest and see if my mind is changed. I believe the ending is spectacular. Let’s hope so.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve been reading movie critics about Maestro. Then I found yours. Thank God. I came away from the film frankly disappointed. I had this sense that it just wasn’t right. The editing doesn’t quite make sense and I can’t figure out why cooper made the choices he made in writing and in directing this movie. In the end it is a disservice to the great Maestro. Carrie Mulligan is such a brilliant actress, she could win the Oscar just by reading pages from the phone book.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. We stopped watching just as we got to the colour section.
    Pretentious and frankly boringly so…
    Agree with tenor of entire review.
    And – whether you think it’s antisemitic ‘Jewface’ or not – I found the exaggerated prosthetic conk very bothersome, distracting and unnecessary…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s rough for sure. You didn’t miss much by stopping where you did, as the movie sadly doesn’t get any better. Thank you so much for taking the time to share your thoughts, I always enjoy hearing from other movie lovers.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Elle Cancel reply