I didn’t have big expectations for “Wonder Woman 1984,” the highly-anticipated sequel to one of the best superhero movies in years. All I really wanted was to be entertained by a fun popcorn movie. What a letdown that this overly-long, tedious film failed to meet even that basic requirement.
Fast forward to the year 1984. Diana Prince (Gal Gadot) is working as a curator of ancient artifacts, keeping a low profile and only breaking out her Wonder Woman alter-ego when there’s danger in the city. She’s trying to stay out of the spotlight as much as possible (which is ridiculous considering she routinely makes a splash with her jaw-dropping. heroic rescues). When a mysterious monkey paw wishing crystal finds its way into the hands of slick business man with nefarious intentions named Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal), Diana faces off against him and his associate, her former mousy co-worker turned supervillain, Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig). In the mix is Diana’s pilot boyfriend Steve (Chris Pine), who is revived from the dead thanks to the wishing crystal.
The convoluted plot is bogged down with too much detail. Wishes are made and granted, but powers and health are consumed from normal people who ask out loud for their greatest desires to come true. It kinda sorta makes sense, but it’s too complicated for a superhero movie. Wiig does not make a great villain, and Pascal hams it up so much he’s a distraction. Gadot certainly looks the part, but I still contend that she lacks charisma. The nonexistent chemistry between her and Pine hurts the narrative.
The corny special effects are downright comical and look like something that would’ve been in a movie set in that time period. Thankfully, the film doesn’t rely too heavily on nostalgia, except for a ridiculous montage as Diana dresses Steve up in era-appropriate clothing. (If you think fanny packs are funny, this will absolutely work for you).
A big sticking point for me, and I know comic book geeks will be divided on this issue, is that I like to stick to the classic books and am in the “Wonder Woman cannot fly” camp. Yes, she was given the ability to fly under her own power in the late 1980s (by George Pérez), but it’s something that still bothers me. Here she zooms around like Superman, and it may also annoy a few other purists (although I admit that I’m more sensitive than most about this).
The ending is more of the same old routine, with a showy CGI fight sequence between the bad guys and our superheroine. By this point, I didn’t really care what happened to any of the characters — which is a huge breakdown in storytelling. I never felt like anyone was in real danger, making it difficult to be engaged at all. Director Patty Jenkins is more than competent, but the material is too unexciting and the performances too lackluster to deliver much more than a stale action piece and flat comic book fantasy.
“Wonder Woman 1984” is not a great superhero movie, but it’s not a total stinker. Fans of the DC Comics character will likely find enough to enjoy to make it moderately engaging instead of downright hating it. In that sense, you could consider this unexciting film a mild success.
By: Louisa Moore
Screen Zealots 
Agreed. Bothered me that WW flew, like Superman. The one part I did like was the invisible jet explanation, which may have gotten lost on some if not paying close attention. Also, if memory serves me correctly, WW, herself, knew how to fly her own invisible jet, but had to be told by Steve Trevor how flying works. I did, though, like how WW incorporated and utilized Steve’s flying a jet that she made invisible, w/o radar detection, in to the story. I just didn’t like her flying w/o her jet later in the movie, like Superman. I also very much enjoyed the invisible jet flight scene with the fireworks and clouds. It gave me a brief feeling of joy in a very, very long, choppy movie. I also became bored with the dress-up Steve Trevor scene, as it’s been done in so many other movies. But, I get that it was WW’s turn to see Steve in different outfits as he saw her try on clothes in the first movie. Also, watch closely, as one outfit ties in something in the end. And, of course, sit through all of the credits, or you’ll miss the best part. I would have given it 2 1/2 stars, only because I wanted to like it more than I did.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you so much for commenting! It’s nice to hear from a fellow WW fan. I wanted to like the movie but what a letdown. Especially after the first one, it was so good!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah. It was a mediocre movie for me, too. I would have given it 2 1/2 stars to play on the idea that it was 2 1/2 hours long. One star per hour. That method makes just about as much sense as the movie did. I just really could not buy into the main antagonist’s motives. They brought about chaos, anarchy, and the destruction of the world. What good is having it all if you destroy everything? He had to have understood this. And yet, he persisted. That made no sense. This movie would have been better served if it stuck to the relationship between Diana and Barbara. Oh yeah…the jet and suit of armor were put there as a convenience to move the plot along. Her ability to fly was more of a contrivance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Al very valid comments, Bernard. Thank you for sharing your thoughts!
LikeLike
I was so looking forward to it. Blah.
LikeLiked by 2 people
click this link here now [url=https://onion.hdrhdr.com]гидра сайт[/url]
LikeLike