I was more than a little excited to see Antoine Fuqua‘s remake of “The Magnificent Seven,” a remake (of a remake) by a director who should’ve been the most crazy amazing choice to handle this material. Well, I didn’t anticipate just how humdrum of a movie this would be. It’s surprisingly poorly directed and is just about as unexciting as movies come.
The classic story of a band of outlaws who come to the aid of desperate townspeople is certainly enjoyable enough, but that’s where my enjoyment of the movie ended. The problem is that there’s absolutely nothing special about this particular retelling of the classic story that makes it a standout. It’s just blah blah blah, more of the same, and has zero reason to exist. Note to Hollywood: I’m so sick of this bland rehashing that’s running rampant in the film industry. If you’re going to remake / reboot a movie or tell a well known story, then take the time and the care to make something special. Don’t waste everyone’s time with a commonplace snooze fest like this.
This film is packed with some of the most mediocre dialogue and acting that I’ve seen this year. The roster of talent is impressive and includes Fuqua alums Ethan Hawke and Denzel Washington, as well as Chris Pratt (his wisecracking cowboy shtick here is even more annoying than usual), Peter Sarsgaard (as a scenery-chewing, ridiculously over-the-top villain), and Vincent D’Onofrio (as a loveable Grizzly Adams type). Rounding out the seven outlaws are Byung-hun Lee, Martin Sensmeier, and Manuel Garcia-Rulfo. The overall tepid performances make me wonder if any of the actors really wanted to be here. It sure doesn’t seem like it.
Adding to this disconnect is the astonishingly poor character development. We never learn much about any of these characters, including their motivations or backstory (with the exception of Washington’s). These are surface characters, people we can’t connect with or understand. Because of this, I didn’t care about any of them. The film’s PG-13 rating doesn’t help either; the gunplay is toned down as a result. By the time the big shootout in town happens, it’s just too late to make anyone care. Admittedly, the shootout is still pretty awesome — but aren’t all Western shootouts pretty awesome?
I can’t think of much nice to say about this film. The costumes are ordinary, the jumpy editing is obnoxious, the religious imagery is too ‘in your face,’ and the original score by Simon Franglen and James Horner is awkward with its rapid-fire hand clapping. Yes, clapping.
Even if you are a fan of the genre, you’ll want to skip this one. It’s simply a dull movie all around.
As late summer movies go, “The Magnificent Seven” isn’t half-bad. But that’s about the best thing I can say about it.
Denzel Washington is Chisolm, a bounty hunter with a sense of justice. Chris Pratt is Josh Faraday, an outlaw with a knack for getting under people’s skin. Together, they round up a band of five other skilled marksmen and fighters to join them on a fight against robber baron Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard) and his small army of men who have taken over a small western town and murdered several of its inhabitants in cold blood.
As revenge tales go, “The Magnificent Seven” makes an unsatisfying meal. Its gutless PG-13 violence is tame. As westerns go it’s pedestrian, with cinematography that disappoints by refusing to pay much attention to the landscape. The script is unremarkable, too. There are some nice bits of dialogue, but those are mostly highlighted in the trailers and there’s precious little else that is worthy of notice.
Compared to director Antoine Fuqua‘s last outing (“The Equalizer,” which also starred Washington), “The Magnificent Seven” is a lackluster affair. It’s also somehow very appropriate end to a disappointing summer movie season, an unexciting bookend to a string of (mostly) lifeless films that will soon be forgotten. I’m hopeful that the fall season will bring us higher-quality entertainment.
“The Magnificent Seven” isn’t boring, but it’s barely worth watching.
Great review, you bring up a lot of good points. Actually enjoyed it a bit more than you guys did, if only because the final act had interesting Wild West sequences I haven’t seen in a while. Plus I thought the characters were at least charismatic, even if they were all cardboard cutouts of action heroes
It’s difficult for a western to win me over (I am just not a fan of the genre) but I was just completely let down by this one. I thought the shootout was pretty good, but the rest of the movie bored me. Just a disappointment! I’ll head over and check out your review now! –Louisa
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looks like you guys liked it less than I did. Haha.
I honestly don’t blame you guys. Despite the fact that I loved the tension building, the satisfactory character development, the action, the violence, etc.,
I also realize that the actual characters are not necessarily original, and that quite a bit of the movie was cliche…
I haven’t seen the movie–but the first American re-make had the Seven in Mexico–I gather this re-make takes place within the old West of the U.S.–did that make a difference?
Also, the best part of the older version was the Magnificent soundtrack by Elmer Bernstein–was there any use of those themes, or was this with all-new music? (One of my favorite things about the Tom Cruise/MI franchise was the modern re-workings of the old TV-series theme music.)