“A Cure for Wellness”



It’s rare that a film leaves me as puzzled as “A Cure for Wellness” managed to do. This bizarre exercise from director Gore Verbinski it not an easy movie to watch, proving quite challenging even for a seasoned viewer like me. This film is destined to inspire dozens of walkouts not only as a result of the overall uncomfortably menacing tone but the actual graphic onscreen depictions of incest, rape, animal cruelty, infants preserved in jars of formaldehyde, and one of the most horrific dental drilling torture scene since “Marathon Man.”

There’s plenty of violence, plenty of distressing deplorable behavior, and plenty of metaphorical eels. Lots and lots of eels.

When the CEO of an important New York financial firm refuses to return from a secluded, mysterious wellness center in the Swiss Alps, young executive Lockhart (Dane DeHaan) is sent to bring him back. He soon finds himself trapped, being forced into the spa’s miracle water treatments by creepy Doctor Volmer (Jason Isaacs). Of course things aren’t always what they seem, and the terrifying secrets and revelations surrounding an eerie young woman (Mia Goth) soon start to make Lockhart question his own sanity.

Verbinski has a wonderful artistic eye, and this film is visually stunning and distinctly elegant in its unsettling disturbing-ness. The first half hour is absolutely drop dead gorgeous, both visually poetic as well as gracefully written. You’ll be hooked on the mystery early on; it’s the eventual reveal that’s such a major letdown.

This overly long (146 minutes) film is right past the tipping point for all but the most tolerant of viewers, a psychological thriller that is stuffed with so much surrealism and dreamy, grotesque fetish horror that it’s not a freak show you’ll soon forget. This movie is so stylish and so disturbing that it will haunt me for years. It defies classification (but the best descriptor I can muster is that it’s a mash-up of “Shutter Island” and “The Neon Demon”).

It’s an arty freak show in the grandest of the schlock tradition, a horrific horror film that’s also elegantly horrific.


  1. I’ve loved Dane DeHaan as an actor since the HBO show In Treatment, and I was pleased for him that he got a lead role in a film. But from the trailers, and especially reading your review, I don’t think this film is for me. I’m not really a horror film kind of person.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m also not a horror fan but this is more of an “artsy” type of horror rather than a straight out gore fest. DeHaan is so good in it, and it’s visually stunning (probably a must-see if you are a fan of the visual arts).

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m really surprised you saw this. It was a hard movie to sit through. Unfortunately, I don’t think the walk outs happened until much later in the film. One scene I found to be incredibly grotesque. Actually there were two, or three, maybe four.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Why surprised? We both were really looking forward to getting to seeing this one! It was disturbing yet beautiful. But I will say that it is one of the most challenging movies I think I have ever seen.


  3. Hi 😀 Loved your film review. I’ve recently started a blog and have a few film reviews on there that I would love for you to check out. Please feel free to follow back also it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s